Search This Blog

Friday, January 28, 2011

A New Paradigm for Education

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
—Albert Einstein
With all the discussion about New Mexico’s educational standing compared to the United States’ and the world’s standing, one would believe the powers that be would be seeking and embracing changes and solutions that could radically improve New Mexico’s public schools.  Einstein may not have been talking about the century-old educational model still operating in most of New Mexico’s school districts and serving as a guide for many state policies and regulations, but he certainly could have been.
Southwest Secondary Learning Center (SSLC) bases student progress and advancement on the concept of mastery of learning/content as opposed to the traditional measurement of seat time or the Carnegie Unit.  The vast majority of schools throughout the nation measure student advancement on the model developed by the State of Massachusetts in 1906 by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching for the purpose of establishing a retirement fund for elderly college professors.  The Carnegie Unit was created in order to establish a common teaching standard among various Massachusetts institutions of higher learning to determine professor’s eligibility to receive benefits from Carnegie’s $10 million endowment.  In order to keep students in high schools and from prematurely entering college and to provide colleges with uniform admissions standards, the Carnegie Unit (or credit) developed into the measurement tool for secondary schools nationwide.  The standard “unit” was further refined and defined by the amount of time spent in school for a year, week, day or class period or more simply put “seat time.”  This definition of a high school education as “time served” remains firmly entrenched in New Mexico’s schools.  Graduation, attendance, truancy, school calendars and many other state mandated requirements are all based on this antiquated measure of student achievement.  Southwest Secondary Learning Center, a state chartered charter school, is required to adhere to many state mandated requirements that inhibit moving education into the 21st century. 
The SSLC founders acted on their belief that students’ advancement should be based on content mastery and not on “seat time” in front of a teacher.  The SSLC model uses computers as tools for instruction and teaches individual learners at the specific moment that the instruction is needed.  This model of teaching individual students instead of classes or periods should be embraced as an alternative to the traditional school paradigm that most New Mexico students and families have no choice but to accept.  SSLC students’ achievement and advancement is not constrained by the traditional classroom model; 4 walls, 35 desks and a “sage on stage.”  Students’ progress through the course outline is based on content mastery and demonstrated proficiency instead of teachers’ lesson plans.  Instruction is one-on-one and remediation is immediate, a rarity in the traditional classroom.  Students’ opportunity to self-direct their education and their parents’ ability to set individual proficiency standards and monitor progress on line is a model that should be examined by all who wish their children to reach their full potential.  Many critics of the education establishment contend that simply spending more money on the same century-old model will not improve education for New Mexico students.  To continue on the same path is truly insane.

7 comments:

  1. Well put. I agree totally. Some students are able to grasp the lesson and move on quicker and yet in most educational institutions they are held to the same schedule of learning as the other 34. Creating a bored student with no control over their own pace for learning which needs to change if we want more graduates from our high schools. Learning is a life-long pursuit, we should be helping our students find their own pace and go for it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it is great that SSLC is not just advancing kids based on the time in class but rather on their understanding of the subject. This is rare to see, so many schools advance kids that are not ready to be advanced. The idea of social promotion is ridicules and outdated. So many kids get lost in the cracks of public education or are given a free pass because they play sports. I am glad to see a group of educators and administration that values the education of young people so much that they are willing to go against the standard practices in their field.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Speaking from experience with my sons, the overall education model at SLC is very successful. They start in a traditional classroom and then make a comfortable transition into the Computer Lab. These students are guided and mentored along the way and become independant individuals. The instructors/educators in this school place themselves in a position of educator and really interact on an adult level with these students. When you bring a child up to an adult level with those kind of expectations, the child will rise to the occasion. I have first hand experience and am very confident that my sons will continue to do well into their adult life, they are very mature and independant and SLC has fostered that in them and they take their education seriously, so they are engaged and they most importantly see the value of being in school.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a former student, I can tell you first-hand that I actually LEARNED the different subjects required for high school. The process of SSLC taught me not to move on until I fully understood something. When I got to college, I wasn't afraid to get help through professor's office hours, the free campus tutors, to be sure I fully grasped the material. I learned that it is not ok to just move on without understanding.

    I think a lot of students in the traditional system don't fully realize that concepts build on each other. I saw a lot of my peers struggling in college but never quite knowing why. I did really well and was prepared to ask for the help I needed to learn the concepts in a class.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree also, well put. The fact that kids sit in the classroom every day and the teachers assign a grade so they can pass even though the child has no idea what the content was. Then they go to the next grade and my child is put on hold or ignored while the teacher spends time on a subject that this other child should have learned last year. Again, as said before in other blogs, every teacher/school should be held accountable not just the charter schools.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree I also think that with technology and our fast paced world children today attention span is not what it used to be. SSLC’s way of teaching keeps kid engaged in their work because they choose what to work on and they can go as fast as they want, and they also do not have to wait for other kids to master what’s being taught. With all the changes that have occurred in the last 100 years with cars, technology, and just the general way we live our lives day to day shouldn’t the way kids are being taught also evolve.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am a parent of 3 students (one graduated). I brought them to this school because I wanted them to succeed in their educations. Each of my children have different learning needs, and it was here that they could find the style of learning that works for them; they could move through their classes at their own paces; and they could learn the material. In the public schools today, teachers are pressured to move students forward in their education and children still fall between the cracks because the teachers cannot reach each of their students and teach each one in such a way as to fulfill their educational learning needs. Here, at SLC, my children have learned to work and study so they can learn the information and carry it with them through their college education. Thank you SLC!!!!

    ReplyDelete